Plain English. No jargon. The answer first.
EFL spending rules, explained
PSR vs SCR: winners and losers by club
How each Championship club's compliance position changes when you switch from the old loss-based PSR to the new revenue-based SCR. Positive = under the limit; negative = over it. Click any club for the full breakdown. What is PSR and how does it differ from SCR? →
| Club | PSR headroom | SCR headroom | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Birmingham City | −£27.4m | −£8.6m | ▲ £18.8m |
| Blackburn Rovers | +£21.1m | −£7.2m | ▼ £28.3m |
| Bristol City | −£15m | −£1.6m | ▲ £13.4m |
| Burnley P | +£40.2m | −£21.4m | ▼ £61.6m |
| Cardiff City | −£10.7m | −£17.1m | ▼ £6.4m |
| Charlton Athletic | — | −£2.6m | — |
| Derby County | +£17m | −£4.4m | ▼ £21.4m |
| Hull City | +£10m | −£25.2m | ▼ £35.2m |
| Middlesbrough | +£600k | −£4m | ▼ £4.6m |
| Millwall | +£7.6m | −£13.9m | ▼ £21.5m |
| Norwich City | −£25.8m | −£14.7m | ▲ £11.1m |
| Plymouth Argyle | +£36.9m | +£4.9m | ▼ £32m |
| Portsmouth | +£29m | +£960k | ▼ £28m |
| Preston North End | +£7m | −£7.6m | ▼ £14.6m |
| Queens Park Rangers | +£5.2m | −£1.8m | ▼ £7m |
| Sheffield United P | −£8.5m | +£17.7m | ▲ £26.2m |
| Southampton P | +£20m | −£8.8m | ▼ £28.8m |
| Stoke City | −£15.7m | +£5.2m | ▲ £20.9m |
| Swansea City | −£12.6m | −£9m | ▲ £3.6m |
| Watford | +£18.1m | +£16m | ▼ £2.1m |
| West Bromwich Albion | −£4.2m | −£11.3m | ▼ £7.1m |
| Wolverhampton Wanderers P | −£22.1m | −£15.8m | ▲ £6.3m |
| Wrexham | — | +£8.4m | — |
PSR figures are estimated adjusted losses vs the applicable 3-year limit (£39m base; higher for clubs with recent PL seasons). SCR headroom is squad cost vs the 85% revenue limit only. Click any column header to sort.
What the Change column means: it shows the shift in compliance position, not spending power. Large swings usually reflect Premier League history inflating the old PSR limit — not a real change in what clubs can spend. To see who can actually spend more, look at the SCR headroom column. What is PSR and how does it differ from SCR? →
What changed: PSR vs SCR
| Old PSR system | New SCR system |
|---|---|
| Loss-based limits measured over three years | Revenue-based limit on squad spending |
| Punishes overspending after the fact | Monitored in real time, during the season |
| Open to distortion through creative accounting | Tied directly to football income |
| Outcome (a points deduction) often arrives late | Clubs see their position early and clearly |
One nuance worth knowing: 85% is the Green Threshold, not a hard wall. In the Championship, clubs can lean on an owner equity top-up — up to £33m across three years, and no more than £15m in a single season — to invest a little ahead of revenue.
League One clubs: SCMP wage limits
League One clubs follow the Salary Cost Management Protocol (SCMP) — a wage-to-revenue cap — rather than SCR. See the full League One SCMP table →
Compare two clubs
Head-to-head spending power - the parachute-payment gap is where it gets interesting.
Frequently asked questions
What counts as squad cost under SCR?
Player wages, transfer fee amortisation (the annual cost of a fee spread over the contract length), and agent fees. Running costs like stadium upkeep or academy spending do not count toward the SCR limit.
What is the owner equity top-up?
Championship clubs can invest owner equity on top of the 85% limit — up to £15m in a single season and no more than £33m across any rolling three-year window. This lets clubs spend slightly ahead of revenue if owners inject fresh capital, but it's a finite buffer.
What happens if a club breaches the SCR limit?
Clubs that breach face EFL sanctions, which can include transfer embargoes, fines, or points deductions. The penalty is determined by an independent panel based on the scale and persistence of the breach.
Do parachute payments help clubs under SCR?
Yes — significantly. Parachute payments count as football revenue, giving recently relegated clubs a much larger 85% allowance than their Championship peers. A parachuted club might have a limit of £90m+ versus £30–40m for a typical side. But the advantage evaporates once payments end, usually after two or three seasons.