SCR rules confirmed for 2026/27 - currently in shadow for 2025/26. Figures last reviewed 2026-05-17.

SCR head-to-head

Burnley vs Sheffield Utd

On current estimates, Sheffield United has the bigger SCR spending allowance - by roughly £14.7m. Spending power under SCR follows revenue - so the gap is really a revenue gap.

Side by side

Burnley

  • Estimated revenue (football) reported £71.7m
  • SCR limit - 85% of revenue £60.9m
  • + Owner equity top-up (max / season) £15m
  • Effective spending allowance £75.9m
  • Estimated squad cost reported £82.3m
  • Headroom −£6.4m
Balanced - squad cost is 114.8% of revenue

Sheffield United

  • Estimated revenue (football) estimated £89m
  • SCR limit - 85% of revenue £75.7m
  • + Owner equity top-up (max / season) £15m
  • Effective spending allowance £90.7m
  • Estimated squad cost reported £58m
  • Headroom +£32.7m
High spending power - squad cost is 65.2% of revenue

What drives the difference

Neither club receives parachute payments, so this comparison is a cleaner read on self-generated revenue - matchday, commercial and central EFL distributions. The club with the higher allowance has simply built a larger football income.

Comparisons use illustrative estimates from published accounts, not official SCR submissions. SCR uses adjusted football revenue, which differs from headline turnover. Last reviewed 2026-05-17. Full rules explainer →