EFL Squad Cost Ratio · Championship
Championship SCR: how much can every club spend?
The table below ranks all 23 Championship clubs by SCR headroom. Click any club for the full breakdown.
| Club | Revenue | 85% limit | Max (+ top-up) | Squad cost | PSR headroom | SCR headroom | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheffield United P | £89m estimated | £75.7m | £90.7m | £58m reported | −£8.5m reported | +£17.7m | High spending power |
| Watford | £57.6m reported | £49m | £64m | £33m reported | +£18.1m reported | +£16m | High spending power |
| Wrexham | £33.3m reported | £28.3m | £43.3m | £20m reported | — | +£8.4m | High spending power |
| Stoke City | £32.3m reported | £27.5m | £42.5m | £22.3m reported | −£15.7m estimated | +£5.2m | High spending power |
| Plymouth Argyle | £25.6m reported | £21.8m | £36.8m | £16.9m reported | +£36.9m reported | +£4.9m | High spending power |
| Portsmouth | £13.6m reported | £11.6m | £26.6m | £10.6m reported | +£29m estimated | +£960k | High spending power |
| Bristol City | £40.3m reported | £34.3m | £49.3m | £35.9m reported | −£15m reported | −£1.6m | Balanced |
| Queens Park Rangers | £25.9m reported | £22m | £37m | £23.8m reported | +£5.2m estimated | −£1.8m | Balanced |
| Charlton Athletic | £11.2m reported | £9.5m | £24.5m | £12.1m estimated | — | −£2.6m | Restricted |
| Middlesbrough | £32.2m reported | £27.4m | £42.4m | £31.4m reported | +£600k reported | −£4m | Restricted |
| Derby County | £31.9m reported | £27.1m | £42.1m | £31.5m reported | +£17m estimated | −£4.4m | Restricted |
| Blackburn Rovers | £21.4m reported | £18.2m | £33.2m | £25.4m reported | +£21.1m estimated | −£7.2m | Restricted |
| Preston North End | £16.9m reported | £14.4m | £29.4m | £22m reported | +£7m estimated | −£7.6m | Restricted |
| Birmingham City | £35.6m reported | £30.3m | £45.3m | £38.9m reported | −£27.4m reported | −£8.6m | Restricted |
| Southampton P | £85m reported | £72.3m | £87.3m | £81m reported | +£20m reported | −£8.8m | Restricted |
| Swansea City | £21.5m reported | £18.3m | £33.3m | £27.3m reported | −£12.6m estimated | −£9m | Restricted |
| West Bromwich Albion | £30.4m reported | £25.8m | £40.8m | £37.1m reported | −£4.2m reported | −£11.3m | Restricted |
| Millwall | £23.9m reported | £20.3m | £35.3m | £34.2m reported | +£7.6m estimated | −£13.9m | Restricted |
| Norwich City | £39.3m reported | £33.4m | £48.4m | £48.1m reported | −£25.8m reported | −£14.7m | Restricted |
| Wolverhampton Wanderers P | £172m reported | £146.2m | £161.2m | £162m reported | −£22.1m reported | −£15.8m | Balanced |
| Cardiff City | £25.8m reported | £21.9m | £36.9m | £39m reported | −£10.7m reported | −£17.1m | Restricted |
| Burnley P | £71.7m reported | £60.9m | £75.9m | £82.3m reported | +£40.2m reported | −£21.4m | Restricted |
| Hull City | £25.8m reported | £21.9m | £36.9m | £47.1m reported | +£10m estimated | −£25.2m | Restricted |
How to read this table
85% limit is what SCR guarantees: 85% of estimated football revenue, no owner injection required. Max (+ top-up) is the ceiling if the owner injects the full £15m/season — only a minority of clubs will use this.
PSR headroom shows how much room clubs had under the old loss-based system (£39m over 3 years, higher for clubs with recent PL seasons). Positive = was inside the old rules; negative = breached. SCR headroom is squad cost vs the 85% limit only. Compare the two columns to see whether a club is better or worse off under SCR.
Most clubs with large PSR headroom had it because their PL history lifted the £39m limit — not because they were spending conservatively. Under SCR there is no history bonus: every club is judged on this season's revenue.
Parachute clubs (P) have large but temporary revenue boosts from Premier League parachute payments. Their headline headroom can look generous now, but drops sharply once payments end — usually after two or three seasons.
Status key
How SCR differs from PSR
Under the old PSR rules, clubs were judged on total losses over three years. SCR instead caps squad spending as a live proportion of revenue — monitored during the season, not after the fact. The shift rewards clubs with growing income and penalises wage-heavy rosters regardless of player sales.