SCR is live for 2026/27 in the Premier League and Championship. Figures last reviewed 2026-09-03.

Championship SCR

How much can Norwich City spend?

Under the EFL's Squad Cost Ratio rules, Norwich City have a guaranteed spending limit of £33.4m — 85% of estimated football revenue of £39.3m. Against their estimated squad cost that is £14.7m short. If the owner injects the maximum top-up (£16m/season), the ceiling rises to £49.4m.

Norwich City: the SCR breakdown

  • Estimated revenue (football) reported £39.3m
  • 85% SCR limit (no owner top-up) £33.4m
  • Estimated squad cost reported £48.1m
  • Headroom vs 85% limit −£14.7m
  • + Max owner equity top-up (if used) £16m
  • Max spending allowance (with top-up) £49.4m
  • Headroom vs max allowance +£1.3m
Balanced - squad cost is 122.4% of revenue

What this means

On these estimates, Norwich City are spending above the 85% Green Threshold but within reach of it - the kind of position the owner top-up allowance is designed to cover. Manageable, but not unlimited.

Summer 2026 window vs SCR headroom

No disclosed net-spend figure for the summer 2026 window. Press-reported transfer fees for Norwich City could not be reconciled closely enough to publish a net figure, so this site records nothing rather than guessing — a reporting gap, not a sign they spent nothing.

Sports Mole's dedicated tracker (updated 3 Sep 2026, after window close) lists confirmed transfers and states total spend £0m / income £0m / net spend £0m; it does not mention Sam Field or Josh Sargent. Cross-check found Sargent's move to Toronto FC actually completed 27 Feb 2026 (winter window), so it's out of scope for this comparison regardless. Sam Field's QPR fee could not be independently verified as falling in-window. Re-researched 2026-09-06, no change from the original null.
Source.

Spending beyond calculated headroom is not automatically a breach: transfer fees are amortised over the contract, sales offset signings, and none of it reaches SCR squad cost until the next accounts are filed. Every club's window spend vs headroom →

Old rules vs new: PSR compared to SCR

Under the old PSR system, clubs were judged on total losses over three years, not on what they spent on the squad as a share of revenue. Here's how Norwich's position compares under both sets of rules.

Old PSR (loss-based) New SCR (revenue-based)
3-year losses: £64.8m reported
Limit: £39m
Headroom: −£25.8m
2021/22–2023/24 (Championship)
Squad cost: £48.1m
85% limit: £33.4m · Max (with top-up): £49.4m
Headroom: −£14.7m
Based on £39.3m revenue

Significantly exceeded the £39m limit - £23.6m, £27.2m and £14m losses over three years (total £64.8m, £25.8m over limit). No EFL enforcement action was taken. New ownership (Mark Attanasio, 2025) provides restructuring opportunity.

Note on this club's figures. 2024/25 revenue £39.3m (down 46% from £73.1m in 2023/24 as parachute payments ended). Wages £48.1m (122% of revenue). Parachute period now fully expired. Sources: matchdayfinance.com, Swiss Ramble, pinkun.com.
Source.

Compare Norwich with another club

← All Championship SCR clubs ranked by SCR headroom

Figures are illustrative estimates from published accounts, named analyst estimates and public reporting, not official SCR submissions. SCR uses adjusted football revenue, which differs from headline turnover. Last reviewed 2026-09-03. Full rules explainer →