SCR is live for 2026/27 in the Premier League and Championship. Figures last reviewed 2026-09-03.

Championship SCR

How much can Millwall spend?

Under the EFL's Squad Cost Ratio rules, Millwall have a guaranteed spending limit of £20.3m — 85% of estimated football revenue of £23.9m. Against their estimated squad cost that is £13.9m short. If the owner injects the maximum top-up (£16m/season), the ceiling rises to £36.3m.

Millwall: the SCR breakdown

  • Estimated revenue (football) reported £23.9m
  • 85% SCR limit (no owner top-up) £20.3m
  • Estimated squad cost reported £34.2m
  • Headroom vs 85% limit −£13.9m
  • + Max owner equity top-up (if used) £16m
  • Max spending allowance (with top-up) £36.3m
  • Headroom vs max allowance +£2.1m
Balanced - squad cost is 143.1% of revenue

What this means

On these estimates, Millwall are spending above the 85% Green Threshold but within reach of it - the kind of position the owner top-up allowance is designed to cover. Manageable, but not unlimited.

Summer 2026 window vs SCR headroom

  • Window spend (gross) £1m
  • Window sales £15m
  • Net sale estimated −£14m
  • Pre-window effective SCR headroom (85% limit plus any top-up or allowance) £2.1m
  • Against the 85% line alone −£13.9m
Within headroom

A net sale of −£14m leaves £16.1m of the £2.1m of effective headroom Millwall had before the window opened — the 85% limit plus any owner top-up or allowance, minus estimated squad cost, the same basis as the transfer-window table.

Against the 85% line alone, with no top-up, Millwall's pre-window headroom was −£13.9m (already over the line).

Most incomings were free/undisclosed/loan; only Elkan Baggott from Ipswich had a reported fee (~£1m initial). Outgoing driven by Femi Azeez to Brighton on deadline day for a reported £12.5-15m. Sports Mole's own summary states total spend £0m, differing from this row's £1m Baggott inclusion — flagged as source disagreement.
Source.

Spending beyond calculated headroom is not automatically a breach: transfer fees are amortised over the contract, sales offset signings, and none of it reaches SCR squad cost until the next accounts are filed. Every club's window spend vs headroom →

Old rules vs new: PSR compared to SCR

Under the old PSR system, clubs were judged on total losses over three years, not on what they spent on the squad as a share of revenue. Here's how Millwall's position compares under both sets of rules.

Old PSR (loss-based) New SCR (revenue-based)
3-year losses: £31.4m estimated
Limit: £39m
Headroom: +£7.6m
2022/23–2024/25 (Championship)
Squad cost: £34.2m
85% limit: £20.3m · Max (with top-up): £36.3m
Headroom: −£13.9m
Based on £23.9m revenue

Approximately £31.4m losses over three years - £7.6m under the limit. Losses of ~£12m, £19.1m and £0.3m. Consistent player trading profits (£21.6m in 2024/25) kept overall losses manageable. One of the better-managed PSR positions among mid-table Championship clubs.

Note on this club's figures. 2024/25 revenue £23.9m (up from £21.5m). Total staff costs £34.2m incl. £5.4m player amortisation; wages alone £28.6m. £21.6m player sales kept overall loss to just £0.3m. Sources: matchdayfinance.com, millwallfc.co.uk official accounts, Companies House.
Source.

Compare Millwall with another club

← All Championship SCR clubs ranked by SCR headroom

Figures are illustrative estimates from published accounts, named analyst estimates and public reporting, not official SCR submissions. SCR uses adjusted football revenue, which differs from headline turnover. Last reviewed 2026-09-03. Full rules explainer →