Premier League SCR
How much can Ipswich Town spend?
£161.7m is adjusted revenue: headline turnover of £155.4m plus a three-season average of £6.3m profit on player sales, which is the denominator SCR actually uses.
Ipswich Town: the SCR breakdown
- Estimated revenue (football) reported £155.4m
- + Player trading profit/loss (3-yr average) +£6.3m
- Latest single season was +£15.4m not used alone
- = Adjusted revenue (SCR basis) £161.7m
- 85% SCR limit £137.4m
- Estimated squad cost estimated £117.3m
- Player wages £77.1m
- Player amortisation £34m
- Agents' fees £6.2m
- Squad cost = player wages + player amortisation + agents' fees. Composed estimate — no club discloses the SCR split.
- Headroom vs 85% limit +£20.1m
- Red Threshold (115% of adjusted revenue) £186m
- Headroom vs Red Threshold +£68.7m
For reference, Transfermarkt's current squad market value is £239.2m (source) — a transfer-market valuation, not the same thing as squad cost. It's shown purely as a sanity-check on the scale of the composed wage/amortisation figure above, not as an input to the SCR calculation itself.
What this means
On these estimates, Ipswich Town sit comfortably inside the 85% Green Threshold. They have room to invest in the squad without straining the rules.
Summer 2026 window vs SCR headroom
- Window spend (gross) £171m
- Window sales £16m
- Net spend reported £155m
- Pre-window effective SCR headroom (85% limit plus any top-up or allowance) £20.1m
A net spend of £155m is £134.9m beyond the £20.1m of effective headroom Ipswich had before the window opened — the 85% limit plus any owner top-up or allowance, minus estimated squad cost, the same basis as the transfer-window table.
Gross spend ~£171m across 14 permanent signings (broke the record for a newly promoted club), sales income ~£16m, net spend ~£155m (internally consistent: 171-16=155). Sky Sports/StatiSense reporting instead puts Ipswich's net spend at £190.7m (likely a different fee-accounting method, e.g. including add-ons); the £171m/£16m/£155m set used here is arithmetically verifiable.
Source.
Spending beyond calculated headroom is not automatically a breach: transfer fees are amortised over the contract, sales offset signings, and none of it reaches SCR squad cost until the next accounts are filed. Every club's window spend vs headroom →
Old rules vs new: PSR compared to SCR
Under the old PSR system, clubs were judged on total losses over three years, not on what they spent on the squad as a share of revenue. Here's how Ipswich's position compares under both sets of rules.
| Old PSR (loss-based) | New SCR (revenue-based) |
|---|---|
|
3-year losses: £30.2m
reported
Limit: £61m Headroom: +£30.8m 2022/23 (League One) to 2024/25 (Premier League) — a mixed-division 3-year window |
Squad cost: £117.3m
85% limit: £137.4m Headroom: +£20.1m Based on £161.7m adjusted revenue |
Ipswich's 3-year PSR/FFP window spans League One, Championship and Premier League seasons as they rose through the divisions, so the applicable loss threshold is the blended figure reported by the club/analysts (£61m over 3 years, roughly £20m/season average) rather than a single competition's flat limit. Aggregate 3-year losses of approximately £30.2m leave headroom of about £32m against that £61m threshold, per Swiss Ramble's analysis of the 2024/25 accounts. The 2024/25 single-year result was a £4.0m pre-tax profit (or a £6.2m loss on football operations before player trading, and a £0.4m loss excluding the Delap sale), a swing from a £39.3m loss in 2023/24.
Source.
Compare Ipswich with another club
← All Premier League SCR clubs ranked by SCR headroom